Gaiergy Corp home
Executive summaryOctober 2026

Governance and Operations of Thermal Energy Networks

Purpose. To help cities and states decide who owns a thermal energy network (TEN), how it sells service and how it is paid for.

Key takeaways

01Three decisions are linkedWho owns the networkHow it sells serviceHow it is paid for
02State law is the gate13 states have a heat network law31 states: cities need express state permission
03Split ownership broke the financingTroy, New York, 2025One owner now holds the whole network
04Utility pilots stall on costMaryland: stalledLowell, Massachusetts: canceled
05Cities are getting direct pathsVermont, 2024Colorado, 2026
06One building is not a utilityOne building: a building systemMany owners: a utilityHeat is optional: sign-ups are the risk
07Get the labels rightRegulators judge substance, not names63-20, 501(c)(3), conduit issuerDifferent tools, different end states
08Longer terms lower yearly chargesRepay over 40 to 60 yearsTotal interest rises
09Plan without federal support30% credit through 2032No credit written for heat networksFederal pilots: 5 selected, 3 left
1

The three decisions

A TEN is a shared loop of water-filled pipe that links wells or another heat source to heat pumps in many buildings. It crosses property lines and runs under public streets, so it looks like a utility even when it is small. Each choice limits the other two:

  • The federal credit goes to the owner of the ground loop and at least one connected heat pump [2]. Tax-exempt bonds can cut it by up to 15% [3, 4].
  • The New York Public Service Commission (PSC) treats an owner that serves multiple customers across property lines as generally a utility [5].
  • A Revenue Ruling 63-20 nonprofit corporation hands title to the government when its bonds are paid off [6]. A 501(c)(3) owner with qualified 501(c)(3) bonds can keep the network [7].

Gaiergy view: Test all three decisions together, early, against the state law that applies.

Wheel: Gaiergy graphic, full report Figure 1.

2

Who can own a network

PUBLIC
PRIVATE
1City or town
Boise, since 1983 [8]
2County or regional
Washington public utility districts, 2024 law [9]
3State authority
New York Power Authority, TEN role not confirmed [10]
4Federal agency
Energy Department pilots: 5 selected, 3 left [11, 12]
5Shared ownership
Troy, New York: split plan dropped 2025 [13]
6Nonprofit or co-op
District Energy St. Paul [14]
7Investor-owned utility
Eversource, Framingham [15]
8Private developer
Whisper Valley, Austin [16]

Split title can block financing. In Troy, New York, the local development corporation that was to own the well field had no taxing powers or other revenue. The plan was dropped in August 2025; one owner now holds the whole network [13]. Utility pilots stall on cost. The Maryland PSC did not approve pilots in December 2025 [22] (PSC order not confirmed); National Grid canceled its Lowell pilot in December 2024 [23].

3

State law is the gate

Heat network laws, September 2026 [26]

City powers under Dillon's Rule, 2003 survey [25]

United States map of state heat network laws, September 2026
Build or pilot law (9)
Funding or study (4)
Related water law (2) [26, 27]
No law found (35)
☆Direct city path: Vermont 2024 [39], Colorado 2026 [35]
United States map of city powers under Dillon's Rule, 2003 survey
All cities need express state permission (31)
Some local governments only (8)
Not Dillon's Rule (10)
Unclear (1)

Under Dillon's Rule, a city has only the powers the state gives it in express terms [25]. By Gaiergy's count 13 states have a TEN law; the tracker lists 14, with Texas [26]; Rhode Island's enactment is not confirmed [44]. Gaiergy view: Look for an express state grant before planning to own a network.

4

How service is sold

Working definitions: a power or thermal purchase agreement (PPA, TPA) sells metered heat; energy as a service (EaaS) sells an outcome for a flat fee; an energy service agreement (ESA) pays on measured savings. A different federal contract, the Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) energy sales agreement, can run up to 25 years under 42 United States Code 8287(a)(1) [57]. Gaiergy view: The key risk test is who pays when heat use changes.

Hospital, university or government campus
PPA or TPA with take-or-pay
Steady load, strong credit
Apartment buildings, small owners
EaaS or flat monthly fee
Predictable bill
Existing building retrofit
ESA
Pays on measured savings
Federal facility
ESPC energy sales agreement
Up to 25 years [57]
Customers of a regulated utility
Tariff approved by the PSC [31]
Rates set through the regulator
Contract that often fits each customer, in Gaiergy's view except where a source is shown.
5

How it is paid for, and paid back over 40 to 60 years

Who repays. A revenue bond is repaid from network charges, with no pledge of taxing power, and may default if that revenue falls short [61]. Gaiergy view: Bond buyers want proof that customers will connect and pay.

Tax-exempt P3. Gaiergy view: A public-private partnership (P3) can combine these pieces. The 501(c)(3) nonprofit project company owns the network and keeps its nonprofit status. Partners do not have to be nonprofits: a private partner can be a contractor within the 501(c)(3) structure or a partner in it. Qualified 501(c)(3) bonds sit outside the state volume cap [78].

Federal credit. 30% with prevailing wage and apprenticeship rules, or under 1 megawatt (MW), if construction begins before 2033; then 26% in 2033, 22% in 2034 and none after [4]. Governments and tax-exempt bodies can take it as direct pay [79]. No federal credit is written for TENs [4, 92]. Of 5 community geothermal pilots the Department of Energy selected [11], its page now lists 3 [12].

Illustrative: $10 million at a fixed 4%, level yearly payments, 100 buildings. Not a forecast. Gaiergy illustration, full report Figure 14.

Illustrative: From 30 to 60 years the yearly payment falls 23.6%; total interest rises from $7.3 million to $16.5 million.

DC Water, the District of Columbia water and sewer utility, sold a 100-year bond [67].

6

Match the model to the site

One public building, no plan to expand. A building system, not a utility. A city that owns the loop and heat pumps can take the credit by direct pay if under 1 MW or if it meets domestic content [79, 2, 3]; how the MW test applies to heat pumps is not confirmed [3].
A private project with a signed development deal. Work inside that deal: the developer and its energy partner lead. Whisper Valley in Austin: the provider owns and runs four district systems for over 800 homes [16].
A blank public site next to a large new anchor. The best case for a new network. Every owner, contract and financing model is still open.
A dense district with many owners. A shared model with layered contracts. Troy's final plan puts one owner over the whole network [13].
Start with the site, not the owner. Gaiergy's view except where a source is shown. Gaiergy graphic, full report Figure 16.
7

A checklist for a city or state

Gaiergy view: 8 of the report's 15 yes or no gates; a "no" shows where work is needed
Law and authorityGates 1 to 3
  • Does a state statute name your owner type?
  • Has the regulator said how it will treat the structure?
Owner and contractGates 4 to 8
  • A large anchor customer ready to sign?
  • One party owns the loop and at least one heat pump?
MoneyGates 9 to 13
  • Is the credit cut of up to 15% in the model? [3, 4]
  • Each financing entity named by what it is in law?
Customers and operationsGates 14 to 15
  • Who pays if heat use goes up or down?
  • A qualified operator for the life of the bonds?
Read the full report: https://gaiergy.com/research/ten-governance-and-operations/
Numbers in brackets match the Sources list in the full report.
Sources accessed 2026-09-30. Gaiergy view marks Gaiergy opinion. Not confirmed means not found in a primary source. Illustrative means not a forecast.

Read the full report  |  Download this summary as a PDF